0.08/0.13 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.14/0.17 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 1200 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 120 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 15:24:04 EDT 2021 0.17/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.39 % Number of cores: 8 0.17/0.39 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.17/0.39 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.26/0.41 # No SInE strategy applied 0.26/0.41 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 59.18/59.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic h208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I 59.18/59.49 # and selection function SelectVGNonCR. 59.18/59.49 # 59.18/59.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.081 s 59.18/59.49 # Presaturation interreduction done 59.26/59.58 # No success with AutoSched0 59.26/59.58 # Trying AutoSched1 for 26 seconds 85.23/85.58 # AutoSched1-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S0Y 85.23/85.58 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 85.23/85.58 # 85.23/85.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.081 s 85.23/85.58 # Presaturation interreduction done 85.34/85.65 # No success with AutoSched1 85.34/85.65 # Trying AutoSched2 for 8 seconds 86.96/87.29 # AutoSched2-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S 86.96/87.29 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP. 86.96/87.29 # 86.96/87.29 # Preprocessing time : 0.036 s 86.96/87.29 # Presaturation interreduction done 86.96/87.29 86.96/87.29 # Proof found! 86.96/87.29 # SZS status Theorem 86.96/87.29 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_281_KS_Odistinct_I1_J, axiom, ![X57:secrecy_Keys, X58:secrecy_Secrets]:(secrecy_kKS @ X57)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X58), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_281_KS_Odistinct_I1_J)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_279_KS_Oexhaust, axiom, ![X340:secrecy_KS]:(![X341:secrecy_Keys]:(X340)!=(secrecy_kKS @ X341)=>~(![X342:secrecy_Secrets]:(X340)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X342))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_279_KS_Oexhaust)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_301_LocalSecretsComposition__neg1, axiom, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID, X5:secrecy_specID, X209:secrecy_KS]:((((![X410:secrecy_Secrets]:((~(ine @ X4 @ (secrecy_sE @ X410))&~(ine @ X5 @ (secrecy_sE @ X410)))<=(X209)=(secrecy_sKS @ X410))=>(~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X4))=>(~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X1))<=~(member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X5)))))<=![X411:secrecy_Keys]:((~(ine @ X4 @ (secrecy_kE @ X411))&~(ine @ X5 @ (secrecy_kE @ X411)))<=(X209)=(secrecy_kKS @ X411)))<=correc965049635ionLoc @ X1)<=(subcomponents @ X1)=(insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_301_LocalSecretsComposition__neg1)). 86.96/87.29 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ pq)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_6_a2, axiom, (m)=(secrecy_sKS @ secret), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_6_a2)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_3_sg1b, axiom, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ p)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_sg1b)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_4_sg2b, axiom, ~(member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ q)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_4_sg2b)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_9_KS_Oinject_I2_J, axiom, ![X58:secrecy_Secrets, X183:secrecy_Secrets]:((secrecy_sKS @ X58)=(secrecy_sKS @ X183)<=>(X58)=(X183)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_9_KS_Oinject_I2_J)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_5_subPQ, axiom, (subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_5_subPQ)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_0_cCompLoc, axiom, correc965049635ionLoc @ pq, file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_0_cCompLoc)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_1_sg1a, axiom, ~(ine @ p @ (secrecy_sE @ secret)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_sg1a)). 86.96/87.29 thf(fact_2_sg2a, axiom, ~(ine @ q @ (secrecy_sE @ secret)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_2_sg2a)). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X1965:secrecy_Keys, X1966:secrecy_Secrets]:(secrecy_kKS @ X1965)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X1966), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_281_KS_Odistinct_I1_J])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X2146:secrecy_KS]:((X2146)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk60_1 @ X2146))|(X2146)=(secrecy_sKS @ (esk61_1 @ X2146))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_279_KS_Oexhaust])])])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X43:secrecy_Keys, X20:secrecy_Secrets]:(secrecy_kKS @ X43)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X20), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X9:secrecy_KS]:((X9)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk60_1 @ X9))|(X9)=(secrecy_sKS @ (esk61_1 @ X9))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID, X5:secrecy_specID, X209:secrecy_KS]:((subcomponents @ X1)=(insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))=>(correc965049635ionLoc @ X1=>(![X411:secrecy_Keys]:((X209)=(secrecy_kKS @ X411)=>(~ine @ X4 @ (secrecy_kE @ X411)&~ine @ X5 @ (secrecy_kE @ X411)))=>(![X410:secrecy_Secrets]:((X209)=(secrecy_sKS @ X410)=>(~ine @ X4 @ (secrecy_sE @ X410)&~ine @ X5 @ (secrecy_sE @ X410)))=>(~member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X4)=>(~member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X5)=>~member_Secrecy_KS @ X209 @ (localSecrets @ X1))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_301_LocalSecretsComposition__neg1])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ pq), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X20:secrecy_Secrets]:(secrecy_sKS @ (esk61_1 @ (secrecy_sKS @ X20)))=(secrecy_sKS @ X20), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_19, plain, (m)=(secrecy_sKS @ secret), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_6_a2])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2307:secrecy_specID, X2308:secrecy_specID, X2309:secrecy_specID, X2310:secrecy_KS]:((((X2310)=(secrecy_sKS @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2308)|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2309)|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2307)))|(X2310)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X2307|(subcomponents @ X2307)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X2308 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X2309 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))&(ine @ X2308 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|ine @ X2309 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2308)|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2309)|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2307)))|(X2310)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X2307|(subcomponents @ X2307)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X2308 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X2309 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))))&(((X2310)=(secrecy_sKS @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2308)|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2309)|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2307)))|(ine @ X2308 @ (secrecy_kE @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|ine @ X2309 @ (secrecy_kE @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310)))|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X2307|(subcomponents @ X2307)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X2308 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X2309 @ bot_bo1785112429specID)))&(ine @ X2308 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|ine @ X2309 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2308)|(member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2309)|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X2310 @ (localSecrets @ X2307)))|(ine @ X2308 @ (secrecy_kE @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310))|ine @ X2309 @ (secrecy_kE @ (esk77_4 @ X2307 @ X2308 @ X2309 @ X2310)))|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X2307|(subcomponents @ X2307)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X2308 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X2309 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])])])])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ pq), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_22, plain, (secrecy_sKS @ (esk61_1 @ m))=(m), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_23, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ p), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_3_sg1b])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_24, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ q), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_sg2b])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X1801:secrecy_Secrets, X1802:secrecy_Secrets]:(((secrecy_sKS @ X1801)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X1802)|(X1801)=(X1802))&((X1801)!=(X1802)|(secrecy_sKS @ X1801)=(secrecy_sKS @ X1802))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_9_KS_Oinject_I2_J])])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID, X9:secrecy_KS, X5:secrecy_specID]:((X9)=(secrecy_sKS @ (esk78_4 @ X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X9))|member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X4)|member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X5)|(X9)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk77_4 @ X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X9))|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X1)|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X1|(subcomponents @ X1)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ pq), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_19])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_28, plain, (subcomponents @ pq)=(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_5_subPQ])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_29, plain, correc965049635ionLoc @ pq, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_cCompLoc])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X43:secrecy_Keys]:(secrecy_kKS @ X43)!=(m), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_22])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_31, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ p), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_32, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ (secrecy_sKS @ secret) @ (localSecrets @ q), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X20:secrecy_Secrets, X36:secrecy_Secrets]:((X20)=(X36)|(secrecy_sKS @ X20)!=(secrecy_sKS @ X36)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID]:((secrecy_sKS @ (esk78_4 @ pq @ X1 @ X4 @ m))=(m)|member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ X1)|member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ X4)|(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])]), c_0_30])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_35, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ p), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_19])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_36, plain, ~member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ q), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_19])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID, X9:secrecy_KS, X5:secrecy_specID]:(ine @ X1 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X4 @ X1 @ X5 @ X9))|ine @ X5 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ X4 @ X1 @ X5 @ X9))|member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X1)|member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X5)|(X9)=(secrecy_kKS @ (esk77_4 @ X4 @ X1 @ X5 @ X9))|~member_Secrecy_KS @ X9 @ (localSecrets @ X4)|~correc965049635ionLoc @ X4|(subcomponents @ X4)!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X20:secrecy_Secrets]:((X20)=(secret)|(secrecy_sKS @ X20)!=(m)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_19])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, (secrecy_sKS @ (esk78_4 @ pq @ p @ q @ m))=(m), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]), c_0_35]), c_0_36])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_40, plain, ~ine @ p @ (secrecy_sE @ secret), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_sg1a])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_41, plain, ~ine @ q @ (secrecy_sE @ secret), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_sg2a])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ![X1:secrecy_specID, X4:secrecy_specID]:(ine @ X1 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ pq @ X1 @ X4 @ m))|ine @ X4 @ (secrecy_sE @ (esk78_4 @ pq @ X1 @ X4 @ m))|member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ X1)|member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ (localSecrets @ X4)|(insert1671894227specID @ p @ (insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID))!=(insert1671894227specID @ X1 @ (insert1671894227specID @ X4 @ bot_bo1785112429specID))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37, c_0_27]), c_0_28]), c_0_29])]), c_0_30])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (esk78_4 @ pq @ p @ q @ m)=(secret), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_44, plain, ~ine @ p @ (secrecy_sE @ secret), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_45, plain, ~ine @ q @ (secrecy_sE @ secret), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])). 86.96/87.29 thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]), c_0_43]), c_0_43]), c_0_44]), c_0_45]), c_0_35]), c_0_36]), ['proof']). 86.96/87.29 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 86.96/87.29 # Proof object total steps : 47 86.96/87.29 # Proof object clause steps : 25 86.96/87.29 # Proof object formula steps : 22 86.96/87.29 # Proof object conjectures : 9 86.96/87.29 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7 86.96/87.29 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 86.96/87.29 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13 86.96/87.29 # Proof object initial formulas used : 12 86.96/87.29 # Proof object generating inferences : 9 86.96/87.29 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 20 86.96/87.29 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 86.96/87.29 # Parsed axioms : 447 86.96/87.29 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 86.96/87.29 # Initial clauses : 817 86.96/87.29 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 116 86.96/87.29 # Initial clauses in saturation : 701 86.96/87.29 # Processed clauses : 20092 86.96/87.29 # ...of these trivial : 459 86.96/87.29 # ...subsumed : 15003 86.96/87.29 # ...remaining for further processing : 4630 86.96/87.29 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7462 86.96/87.29 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 86.96/87.29 # Backward-subsumed : 20 86.96/87.29 # Backward-rewritten : 25 86.96/87.29 # Generated clauses : 110501 86.96/87.29 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 92931 86.96/87.29 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 31 86.96/87.29 # Paramodulations : 101209 86.96/87.29 # Factorizations : 58 86.96/87.29 # NegExts : 194 86.96/87.29 # Equation resolutions : 7589 86.96/87.29 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional check models : 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional clauses : 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 86.96/87.29 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 86.96/87.29 # Current number of processed clauses : 3883 86.96/87.29 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 416 86.96/87.29 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11 86.96/87.29 # Negative unit clauses : 31 86.96/87.29 # Non-unit-clauses : 3425 86.96/87.29 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 73922 86.96/87.29 # ...number of literals in the above : 374577 86.96/87.29 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 86.96/87.29 # Current number of archived clauses : 659 86.96/87.29 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2902065 86.96/87.29 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 914492 86.96/87.29 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12938 86.96/87.29 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22333 86.96/87.29 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 86.96/87.29 # BW rewrite match attempts : 390 86.96/87.29 # BW rewrite match successes : 149 86.96/87.29 # Condensation attempts : 0 86.96/87.29 # Condensation successes : 0 86.96/87.29 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2006143 86.96/87.30 86.96/87.30 # ------------------------------------------------- 86.96/87.30 # User time : 84.628 s 86.96/87.30 # System time : 2.171 s 86.96/87.30 # Total time : 86.799 s 86.96/87.30 # Maximum resident set size: 2540 pages 86.96/87.30 EOF